Development of a simulated arm model for practicing intravenous fluid administration among nursing students

Main Article Content

Maneechan Wongprad
Chutharat Phonmueang
Phannita Norkaew
Supaporn Singwisut
Amornrat Donwicha
Amoanwan Khongkam
Sakkharin Norrasan

Abstract

This research aimed to develop a simulated arm model for practicing intravenous fluid administration among nursing students and to evaluate its effectiveness on students’ practical skills in a simulated setting. The study was conducted in three phases. Phase 1 involved the development of the simulated arm model through reviewing relevant information, designing the model structure, selecting appropriate materials, and constructing a prototype for intravenous fluid administration practice. Phase 2 involved a trial use of the simulated arm model with 30 third-year nursing students to assess its appropriateness, feasibility, realism, ease of use, and to obtain suggestions for improvement. Phase 3 involved an evaluation of actual use with 118 second-year nursing students to determine the effectiveness of the simulated arm model on intravenous fluid administration skills. The research instruments consisted of 1) the simulated arm model and a skill practice plan, 2) a satisfaction questionnaire toward the use of the simulated arm model, and 3) a checklist for assessing intravenous fluid administration skills. The instruments were examined for content validity, and the satisfaction questionnaire had a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of .89. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and a paired-samples t-test.


The results showed that the developed simulated arm model was appropriate for skill practice, practical for actual use, flexible, durable, and supportive of repeated practice in a simulated setting. The overall satisfaction of second-year nursing students toward the simulated arm model was at a high level (M = 4.36, SD = 0.39). The highest-rated aspects were its benefits for learning and skill practice (M = 4.47, SD = 0.36), followed by confidence after practice (M = 4.44, SD = 0.39). Comparison of intravenous fluid administration skills before and after practice showed that the post-practice score (M = 19.75, SD = 1.80) was significantly higher than the pre-practice score (M = 15.40, SD = 2.05), t = 17.82, p < .001. The findings indicate that the developed simulated arm model can be used as an instructional medium to support nursing students’ practice of intravenous fluid administration skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wongprad, M., Phonmueang, C., Norkaew, P., Singwisut, S., Donwicha, A., Khongkam, A., & Norrasan, S. (2026). Development of a simulated arm model for practicing intravenous fluid administration among nursing students. Journal of Education Mahasarakham University, 20(3), 165–176. retrieved from https://so09.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JOEMSU/article/view/7449
Section
Research Articles

References

Alexander, M., Corrigan, A., Gorski, L., Hankins, J., & Perucca, R. (2019). Infusion therapy standards of practice. Journal of Infusion Nursing, 42(1S), S1–S224. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000312

Bennett, N., Rodger, M., & Fitzgerald, M. (2020). Simulation in nursing education: Current best practices and future directions. Nurse Education Today, 88, 104357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104357

Bunnasan, B. (2017). Development of a portable adult arm model for blood collection and intravenous fluid administration practice for nursing students. Thai Nursing Council Journal, 32(3), 38–49. (in Thai)

Cant, R. P., & Cooper, S. J. (2017). Use of simulation-based learning in undergraduate nurse education: An umbrella systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 49, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.015

Chiang Mai University. (2022, April 1). Outstanding innovation!! “Arm model for intravenous infusion and intradermal injection.” Retrieved from https://cmu.ac.th/newsdetail.php?q=11744 (in Thai)

Choeichom, S., & Rujivatanakorn, D. (2015). Innovation of arm manikin in practicing intravenous fluid administration of nursing students. Rama Nurse Journal, 21(3), 395–409. (in Thai)

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Nontaphut, T., & Chotiban, P. (2021). Development of an arm intravenous fluid administration training manikin innovation. Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Council Network of Thailand, 7(3), 1–14. (in Thai)

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Omer, T. (2016). Nursing students’ perceptions of satisfaction and self-confidence with clinical simulation experience. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6(7), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v6n7p17

Royal College of Nursing. (2016). Standards for infusion therapy (4th ed.). Royal College of Nursing.

Shin, H., Rim, D., Kim, H., Park, S., & Shon, S. (2020). Educational effectiveness of simulation-based training for nursing students: A meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 87, 104359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104359