Management According to Integrated Buddhism Principles of Ban Chang Subdistrict Administrative Organization Mae Taeng District, Chiang Mai Province

Abstract

This research aims to study: 1) the level of administrative performance of the Ban Chang Subdistrict Administrative Organization, Mae Taeng District, Chiang Mai Province; 2) the comparison of public opinions on the administration of the Ban Chang Subdistrict Administrative Organization, classified by personal factors; and
 3) the problems, obstacles, and recommendations for administrative practices based on the principles of Buddhist integration. A mixed-methods approach was employed, consisting of: 1. Quantitative research, data were collected from 335 residents of the Ban Chang Subdistrict through questionnaires. Statistical methods used included frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation; 2. Qualitative research,
in-depth interviews were conducted with nine key informants, comprising five groups: (1) one representative from the local administration; (2) one Buddhist scholar; (3) one scholar in public administration; and (4) six community representatives. Data were analyzed and synthesized according to the research issues and presented in a descriptive format.

The results revealed that the overall administrative performance of the Ban Chang Subdistrict Administrative Organization, based on the Four Principles of Sangahavatthu (acts of kindness), was at a high level, indicating public satisfaction with the organization’s overall performance. Furthermore, when comparing public opinions based on personal factors — including gender, age, education level, marital status, and monthly income — no statistically significant differences were found, thereby rejecting the research hypothesis. Regarding challenges and obstacles, citizens recommended stronger campaigns and support for drug prevention and solutions, particularly through youth education. They also called for the promotion of occupations and welfare programs for the elderly, underprivileged, and persons with disabilities to foster self-reliance. Moreover, they advocated for more equitable distribution of economic opportunities across all villages and for more inclusive and accessible public services.