INTERNATIONALIZATION STRATEGIES AND THE PRESERVATION OF LOCAL IDENTITY IN CHINESE EDUCATION

Authors

  • Zizhan SONG Department of Educational Administration, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Thailand
  • Thada SITHTHADA Department of Educational Administration, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Thailand
  • Suttipong BOONPHADUNG Department of Educational Administration, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Thailand

Keywords:

Internationalization, Local Identity, Chinese Education, Cultural Diversity, Internationalization at Home, Educational Administration

Abstract

Internationalization has become a major strategy for improving educational quality, research capacity, intercultural learning, and global influence in China. Yet international engagement can also weaken local identity when foreign models are treated as universal, English displaces Chinese and regional languages, or international indicators become more important than educational purpose. This conceptual review examines how Chinese educational institutions can internationalize while preserving and renewing local identity. It integrates research on comprehensive internationalization, internationalization at home, glonacal agency, cultural hybridity, academic identity, and cultural diversity with China's contemporary policy emphasis on high-level educational opening, Chinese characteristics, and mutual learning among civilizations. The article distinguishes identity preservation from cultural isolation: local identity is understood as a dynamic capacity to interpret heritage, language, community knowledge, and institutional mission in changing contexts. It proposes an Integrated Glocal Stewardship Framework linking normative foundations, reciprocal partnerships, culturally grounded curriculum, multilingual practice, inclusive participation, responsible knowledge exchange, and continuous evaluation. The analysis addresses student and staff mobility, transnational programs, English-medium instruction, international research, digital education, vocational cooperation, and cultural communication. The central argument is that sustainable internationalization should expand dialogue and educational quality without producing dependency, imitation, or cultural erasure. Chinese institutions can become more globally connected by making local knowledge visible, intellectually rigorous, mutually translatable, and open to critical exchange.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-25