HIGH-QUALITY EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN CHINA: AN EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION PERSPECTIVE

Authors

  • Cai YUEQING Department of Educational Administration, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Thailand
  • Thada SITHTHADA Department of Educational Administration, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Thailand
  • Suttipong BOONPHADUNG Department of Educational Administration, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Thailand

Keywords:

High-Quality Educational Development, Educational Administration, Educational Governance, China

Abstract

High-quality educational development has become the central orientation of China's education reform as the system shifts from expansion toward improvement in quality, equity, relevance, and sustainability. From an educational administration perspective, this conceptual and policy review synthesizes national policy documents and recent research on education modernization, governance, teacher development, evaluation, digital transformation, regional inequality, and institutional improvement.The analysis interprets high quality as a multidimensional public value rather than a single performance rank, comprising holistic student development, equitable access to strong learning opportunities, professional teaching, relevant curricula, effective and ethical governance, digital inclusion, system resilience, and contribution to social and economic modernization. Administrative responsibilities span strategic alignment, distributed leadership, resource allocation, workforce development, curriculum and teaching support, student services, data governance, supervision, and evidence-informed quality assurance. Persistent challenges include regional disparities, uneven institutional capacity, fragmented implementation, examination and indicator pressure, teacher workload, weak evidence use, digital divides, demographic change, and tension between uniform standards and local diversity.An integrated administrative framework is proposed around shared purpose, contextual diagnosis, coordinated authority, capability building, fair resource rules, developmental evaluation, responsible digitalization, and continuous organizational learning. The central argument is that high-quality development cannot be secured through scale, compliance, or isolated projects alone; it requires administrators to connect policy ambition with the daily conditions in which teachers teach, students learn, and institutions improve.

Published

2026-09-25