learning management Civics subjects using 4MAT teaching methods integrated with cooperative learning To develop critical thinking skills of Mathayomsuksa 3 students at Dara Academy , Chiang Mai Province

Abstract

This article has the objectives of 1) to manage the civics subject learning using the 4MAT teaching method integrated with cooperative learning for Mathayomsuksa 3 students at Dara Wittayalai School. 2) to study the results of the learning management subject on civics Using 4MAT teaching techniques integrated with cooperative learning that can develop critical thinking skills of Mathayomsuksa 3 students at Dara Wittayalai School. Chiang Mai Province, the research area is an educational institution at Dara Wittayalai School. The research area and the sample used for the research were Mathayomsuksa 3 students at Dara Wittayalai School. Chiang Mai Province, semester 2, academic year 2022, 1 room, 48 students, using 6 hours of 4 MAT integrated learning with cooperative learning. The research tools consisted of a learning management plan using Arrangement of format learning activities (4MAT) for developing critical thinking abilities. 2 hours of legal experience. 2 hours of learning about law through experience. Presentation integrated with learning. 2 hours of cooperative knowledge, a learning management plan quality assessment form, and a quality assessment form for learning worksheets. Learning management of civics matters with 4 MAT techniques, integrating cooperative learning to develop critical thinking skills. The experiment was conducted according to the research pattern. The IOC was calculated by using the Index of Item Objective Congruence. Data were analyzed by means.

Research findings on civics learning management with 4MAT integrated with cooperative learning to develop the critical thinking skills of Mathayomsuksa 3 students in the target group of 48 people. Together with the 4MAT technique, the target group of 48 people found that from the combined workpiece score, the average score was 76.33. It was found that 43 students (90%) passed the set good criteria, which is 70%. 5 people (10%) passed the minimum criteria set, which is 60% and did not find the target group of students who did not pass the assessment criteria. When combining the average scores of the 48 target groups, it was found that the total average score was 76.33 percent, which was within the set good criteria