Analysis of the Critical Success Factors that Affect the Implementation of Local Agenda 21 in Thailand
Keywords:
Local Agenda 21, Local Authority, Success Factor, Sustain- able Development, ParticipationAbstract
Led by local governments and driven by the participation of local people, Local Agenda 21 (LA 21) has been implemented in Thailand to lay the foundation for sustainable management of natural and environmental resources. Unfortunately, after over a decade, only 2.39% of the local governments nationwide have taken the effort seriously. This article aimed to analyze the critical success factors that affect the implementation of LA 21 in Thailand using quantitative research. A questionnaire, developed according to the Stufflebeam’s CIPP model, was applied to systematically collect the data on the implementation of LA 21from every local government in Thailand that has implemented LA 21 to some degree (100%). The results were statistically analyzed by stepwise multiple regression. Three critical success factors in implementing LA 21 successfully in Thailand were found; namely the (1) number of private sectors joining the LA 21 operation team (NumPrivate), (2) implementation budget (ImpBudget) and (3) level of multilateral participation in implementation (ParImp). The relationship among the three factors fitted the equation , with a prediction reliability of 60.70 . The level of multilateral participation in implementation is the most critical factor in successfully implementing LA 21 in Thailand.
References
Barrett, B. & Usui, M. (2002). Local Agenda 21 in Japan: Transforming local environmental governance. 7(1): 49-67.
Cotter, B. & Hannan, K. (1999). Our Community Our Future: A Guide to Local Agenda 21. (Online), Retrieved from: http://www.parksleisure.com.au/documents/item/1189.
(1 December 2016).
Department of Environmental Quality Promotion. (2014). LA 21. (Online), Retrieved from: http://www.deqp.go.th/service-portal/ la-21-system/download/. (4 July 2016).
Department of Environmental Quality Promotion. (2017). LA 21: History. (Online), Retrieved from: http://www.deqp.go.th/service- portal/la-21-system/derivation/. (4 July 2016).
Garcia-Sanchez, I.M. & Prado-Lorenzo, J.-M. (2008). Determinant factors in the degree of implementation of local agenda 21 in the European Union. Sustainable Development. 16:17–34.
Herguner, B. (2012). Local Administrative Reforms in Turkey and the Philippines with regard to Agenda21: Profiling Contexts, Parallelisms, and Contrasts. International Journal of Business and Social Science. 3(9): 107-116.
Herguner, B. (2015). The Citizen Report Card as a Way of Strengthening Service Delivery: A Case Study from Antalya, Turkey. Journal of International Social Research. 8(39): 875-882.
ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability. (1995). Durban,
South Africa. (Online), Retrieved from: http://archive.iclei.org/ index.php?id=1214. (4 July 2016).
Ismail, A.R. (2014). Local Agenda 21 in Malaysia: Is It Still Relevant? (Online), Retrieved from: http://www.rsog.com.my/media/1257. pdf. (5 July 2016).
Joas, M. & Gronholm, B. (2001). Local Level Sustainability Policies
in the Baltic Sea Area: Local Agenda 21 within the Union of the Baltic Cities Network. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment. 30(4): 315-319.
Jorby, S.A. (2002). Local Agenda 21 in Four Swedish Municipalities: A Tool towards Sustainability? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 45(2): 219-244.
Kaur, H. (2009). “Development through decentralisation and good governance: the China and Malaysian experiences in implementing Local Agenda 21” In: Facing the China Challenge International Conference; 2-3 December 2009.
Kessler, E. (1994). (Editorial). AMBIO. 23(7): 389.
Mercer, D & Jotkowits, B. (2000). Local Agenda 21 and Barriers to Sustainability at the Local Government Level in Victoria, Australia. Australian Geographer. 31(2): 163-181.
Ministry of Interior. (2005). Rules of Ministry of Interior B.E. 2548. (Online), Retrieved from: http://www.nkppao.go.th/customers/ content/download/content-711.pdf. (14 July 2016).
Norland, T.I., BjØrnæs, T., & Coenen, F. (2003). Report no.1/03 Local Agenda 21 in the Nordic Countries-National Strategies and Local Status Prosus. (Online), Retrieved from: http://doc.utwente. nl/46238/1/prosusrep2003_01.pdf. (2 August 2016).
Office of the Council of State. (1999). The Decentralization to Local Government Organization Act. The Decentralization to Local Government Organization (Online), Retrieved from: http://www.cmcity.go.th/cmcity/images/document/KM_Law/ Law0005.pdf. (4 July 2016).
Osman, M. M., Rashid, S.N.S.A. & Ahmad, N. (2008). Local Agenda 21 in Malaysia: Issues and Problem Faced by the Stakeholder in the Participation Process. Ecocity World Summit.
Pattenden, M. (1995). Global Implementation of Local Agenda 21. (Online), Retrieved from: http://www.cardinalgroup.ca/nua/aif/ aif03.htm#III;. (14 February 2017).
Raapana, N. (2006). United Nations’ Local Agenda 21 (LA-21) & Communitarian Development Program. (Online), Retrieved from: https://contraeducacao.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/unitednation sagenda21primer-howtomakeglobalslaveryfun.pdf (1 July 2016)
Regional Environment Office 15. (2008). The Project Promoting Multi lateralism in Sustainable Community Development. Phuket.
Roberts, D. & Diederichs, N. (2002). Durban’s Local Agenda 21 pro gramme: tackling sustainable development in a post-apartheid city. Environment & Urbanization. 14(1): 189-201.
Smardon, R.C. (2008). A comparison of local agenda 21 implementation in north American, European and Indian cities. Management ofEnvironmental Quality: An International Journal. 19(1): 118-137.
Stufflebeam, D.L., Madaus, G.F. & Kellaghan, T. (2002). Evaluation Models Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation. 2nd Ed. New York: Kluwer Academic.
The Australian Research Institute for Environment and Sustainability. (2009). Education for Sustainability: The Role of Education in Engaging and Equipping People for Change: Handbook. (Online), Retrieved from: http://aries.mq.edu.au/publications/aries/efs_bro chure/. (1 August 2016).
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA). (2012). Review of implementation of Agenda 21: Detailed review of implementation of Agenda 21. (Online), Retrieved from: http:// sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1126SD21%20 Agenda21_new.pdf. (1 November 2016).
>Read more