DEVELOPMENT OF EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR ART ELEMENTS AND VISUAL ELEMENTS IN THE SUBJECT OF VISUAL ARTS, ANALYSIS AND CRITICISM OF PAINTING WORKS FOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS AT WICHIANMAT SCHOOL

Authors

  • Theppariya Nangkaew Undergraduate, Department of Art Education, Faculty of Education, Thaksin University
  • Kittirat Kasatsuntorn Lecturer, Faculty of Education, Thaksin University
  • Poonkeat Mongkonsawasd Lecturer, Faculty of Education, Thaksin University
  • Phongsathon Chitchontharn Teacher, Art subject, Wichaimat School
  • Jirarot Sriyaphan Professor Dr., Visual Arts/Art Education Program, Faculty of Fine Arts, Thaksin University

Keywords:

Evaluation Criteria, Art and Visual Elements, Visual Arts, Painting

Abstract

This research aimed to 1) develop the criteria for evaluating art elements and visual elements in the subject of visual arts, the category of analyzing and criticizing painting works, 2) test the criteria, and 3) evaluate and improve the criteria using classroom action research. The research was conducted in 3 cycles: 1) Plan, 2) Do & Check, and 3) Act. The target group consisted of 3 people. The method was purposive selection. The tools used were group discussion topics and evaluation forms for using the evaluation criteria. Data analysis included qualitative: content analysis, and quantitative: finding mean and Standard Deviation. The research results found that:

Cycle 1: The results of developing the evaluation criteria consisted of the following components: 1) Content of the work: the work's content was creatively consistent with and appropriate for the specified topic; 2) Artistic skills: principles of visual elements, principles of art composition; and 3) Aesthetics: the ability to express feelings and perceptions about one's own work clearly and reasonably.

Cycle 2: Trial use of the evaluation criteria. The results of the evaluation of the evaluation criteria were at the highest level overall.

Cycle 3: The results of the evaluation and improvement of the evaluation criteria found that some of the evaluation criteria were not as clear as they should be in terms of their meaning. Therefore, the criteria must be adjusted to be appropriate and consistent with the context of the assessment of art elements and visual elements. The scope of the criteria should be explained to the target group to provide more details about the guidelines for using the criteria.

Research findings: The assessment criteria will help clarify the characteristics of students' work, and teachers can explain the assessment results to students, using the assessment criteria as a medium to create a common understanding in scoring and interpreting the meaning of the quality of the work as a standard for assessment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chanstathiphon, P. (2011). Creation of Substances to Promote Creative Economy Concepts of Government Agencies in Thailand. [Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, Chulalongkorn University]. (In Thai)

Chumket, C. (2015). Development of Evaluation Criteria for Creative Management System Standards of Community Business Groups in the Western Region of Thailand. [Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, Silpakorn University]. (In Thai)

Duangkaew, S. (2012). Development of Artistic Creativity Measurement (Visual Arts) for Mathayom 2 Students. [Master of Education Thesis, Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University]. (In Thai)

Jindanurak, T. (2016). Development and Assessment of Creativity in Educational Institutions. Journal of Educational Studies. 27(1), 1 – 14. (In Thai)

Kanchanawasi, S. (2011). Evaluation Theory (3rd ed.). Chulalongkorn University. (In Thai)

Ministry of Education. (2019). National Education Act B.E. 2542. Printing House of the Ministry of Education. (In Thai)

Office of Educational Testing, Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2022). Manual for using the learner competency assessment tool. Aksornthai Printing House. (In Thai)

Phiermaniwong, T. (2013). Development of self-training skills in visual elements and art elements to create visual art works for high school students at St. Gabriel's School, Bangkok. Academic Journal. 7(2) , 1497 – 1508. (In Thai)

Phrommaphan, B. (2008). Monitoring and Evaluation of Project Implementation According to the Plan for Developing the Quality of Life of Informal Labor in the Service Sector: Garbage Talking Labor and Related Labor. Journalism, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. 1(2), 87-93. (In Thai)

Phitthiyanuwat, S. (2006). Using Comparative Grading to Develop Educational Quality. Journal of Education. 29(3), 1. (In Thai)

Phromchui, S. (2007). Project Evaluation Techniques (5th ed.). Chatuphon Design. (In Thai)

Thawornrattanawanich, S. (2019). Development of a model for evaluating creativity through innovative projects for high school students. [Doctoral dissertation, Chulalongkorn University]. (In Thai)

Downloads

Published

08/29/2025

How to Cite

Nangkaew, T., Kasatsuntorn, K., Mongkonsawasd, P., Chitchontharn, P., & Sriyaphan, J. (2025). DEVELOPMENT OF EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR ART ELEMENTS AND VISUAL ELEMENTS IN THE SUBJECT OF VISUAL ARTS, ANALYSIS AND CRITICISM OF PAINTING WORKS FOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS AT WICHIANMAT SCHOOL. Journal of interdisciplinary in Social Sciences and Education, 1(4), 16–30. retrieved from https://so09.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JISSE/article/view/6004

Issue

Section

บทความวิจัย (Research article)