The Pilot Behavior Violation Of Regulations Affect Aircraft Accident.
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This academic article focus on the behavior modulation violates the pilot regulations. As a guideline and suggestion for reducing the number of accidents caused by pilots not following the regulations.
At present, traveling by aircraft has become popular because it is convenient, fast, and time-saving.As a result, there are many people who want to travel by aircraft and air cargo. For this reason, each accident
can cost a lot of damage to the aviation industry and related persons. But most accidents are caused by pilots who violate regulations such as flying without following the correct process, drink alcohol before flying and solving problems on their own without listening to the opinion of the crew or air traffic controller. As a result, the situation can't be solved in time and cause an accident.According to the study, make it found the method adjusted behavior in violation of pilot regulations using the flooding technique, It is the most appropriate. As it is a technique that can be applied to the flight training that pilots have to do on a regular basis. It is used for aviation industry to correct the behavior of pilots' violation of regulations and increase the confidence of passengers and related persons in the safety.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Shappell, S., & others. (2007). Human error and commercial aviation accidents: an analysis using the human factors analysis and classification system. Human factors, 49(2), 227-242.
Shappell, S. A., & Wiegmann, D. A. (1997). A human error approach to accident investigation: The taxonomy of unsafe operations. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 7(4), 269-291.
Wiegmann, D. A., & Shappell, S. A. (2001). Human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents
using the human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) (No. DOT/FAA/AM-01/3,). United
States. Office of Aviation Medicine.
Kelemen, M., & others. (2019). Experimental verification of psychophysiological performance of a selected flight personnel and SW: presurvey for transport safety. Transport problems, 14.
ICAO, A. (2011). 1, Personnel Licensing. International Standards and Recommended Practices, Montreal,Canada.
Mackenzie, D. (2010). ICAO: a history of the international civil aviation organization. University of
Toronto Press.
Bolton, M. L., & Bass, E. J. (2012). Using model checking to explore checklist-suided pilot behavior.
The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 22(4), 343-366.
Shappell, S. A,, & Wiegmann, D. A. (2000). The human factors analysis and classification system-HFACS.
Parohinog, D., & Meesri, C. (2015). ICAO-based needs assessment in Thailand's aviation industry: A basis for designing a blended learning program. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 208, 263-268.
Xue, Y.,&Fu, G.(2018). A modified accident analysis and investigation model for the general aviation
industry: Emphasizing on human and organizational factors. Journal of safety research, 67, 1-15.
Johnston,A.N., &Maurino, D. E. (1990). Human factors training for aviation personnel. ICAO journal,
(5), 16-19.
Shappell,S.A,, &Wiegmann,D. A. (1998). A human error analysis of general aviation controlled flight
into terrain accidents occurring between 1990-1998. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OKLAHOMA
CITY OK CIVIL AEROMEDICAL INST.
Maurino, D. E. (1994). Crosscultural perspectives in human factors training: Lessons from the ICAO
human factors program. The international journal of aviation psychology, 4(2), 173-181.
Dumitru, I. M., & Boscoianu, M. (2015). Human factors contribution to aviation safety. Scientific
Research & Education in the Air Force-AFASES, 2015, (1), 49-53.
You, X., Ji, M., &Han, H.(2013). The effects of risk perception and flight experience on airline pilots'
locus of control with regard to safety operation behaviors. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 57, 131-139.