การติดต่อสื่อสารที่คลุมเครือของบุคลากรด้านการบิน ที่ส่งผลต่อการเกิดอุบัติเหตุของอากาศยาน
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This academic paper focuses on ambiguous communication of aviation personnel affecting the safety of passengers and solution of ambiguous communication in order to provide guideline for the development of good communication within the organization and can be applied to the organization.
According to the study, it is found that the ambiguous communication of aviation personnel result in misunderstanding between personnel and impact of safety to passengers. The article that aviation industry should have is the guideline of developing effective communication. In the Language Aspect, English language is used for communication. Message and speech are concise and have the main idea. Environmental Aspect, they have planned and inspection of equipment before operation. Personnel Aspect, Personnel improve their knowledge to increase their efficiency. And for the Organization Aspect, they have sequenced the steps before the operation. When the aviation industry has evolved to effective communication, there will be minimal risks of insecurity or accidents. Moreover, it can also improve the image and credibility of the organization.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Dean E. Hewes. (2009). The Influence of Communication Processes on Group Outcomes: Antithesis and Thesis, Human Communication Research, Volume 35 (2), 249–271.
Maclellan, E. (2014). How might teachers enable learner self-confidence? A review study. Educational Review, 66 (1), 59-74.
Garosi E, and others (2020). Concerns About Verbal Communication in the Operating Room: A Field Study. Human Factors. 62(6):940-953.
Jentsch, F. G., Salas, E., Sellin-Wolters, S., Bowers, C. A. (1995). Crew coordination behaviors as predictors of problem detection and decision making times. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 39, No. 20, pp. 1350–1353). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Kalantari, R., and others. (2019). Translation and psychometric properties of the Persian version of oxford non-technical skills 2 system: Assessment of surgical teams’ non- technical skills in orthopedic surgery wards. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery, 7, 173–181.
ICAO . (2010). Manual on the implementation of ICAO language proficiency requirements (1st ed). Retrieved from International Civil Aviation Organization: www4.icao.int/aelts/uploads/icaodoc9835 (2nd ed. pdf).
Kim, H., Billington, R. (2018). Pronunciation and comprehension in English as a ingua franca communication: Effect of L1 influence in international aviation communication. Applied linguistics, 39(2), 135–158.
Kim H. (2018). What constitutes professional communication in aviation: Is language proficiency enough for testing purposes?. Language Testing.35 (3): 403-426.
Douglas, D. (2000). Assessing language for specific purposes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Knoch, U. (2014). Using subject specialist to validate an ESP rating scale: The case of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) rating scale. English for Specific Purposes, 33, 77–86.
Estival, D., Farris, C., Molesworth, B. (2016). Aviation English: A lingua franca for pilots and air traffic controllers. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Mackay, R., Mountford, A. (1978). English for specific purposes: A case study approach. London: Longman.
ICAO. (2004). Manual on the implementation of ICAO language proficiency requirements. Montreal, Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization.
Lave, J., Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fields, R. E., Wright, P. C., Marti, P., Palmonari, M. (1998). Air traffic control as a distributed cognitive system: A study of external representations. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (pp. 85–90). Roquencourt, France.
Manias, E., McNamara, T. (2016). Standard setting in specific-purpose language testing: What can a qualitative study add? Language Testing, 33(2), 235–249.
Howard, J. W. (2008). Tower, am I cleared to land?: Problematic communication in aviation discourse. Human Communication Research, 34, 370–391.
Hutchins, E., Klausen, T. (1996). Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. In Engeström, Y., Middleton, D. (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Morrow, D., Rodvold, M. (1998). Communication issues in air traffic control. In Smolensky, M., Stein, E. (Eds.), Human factors in air traffic control (pp. 421– 456).
New York: Academic Press.
Jacoby, S., McNamara, T. (1999). Locating competence. English for Specific Purposes, 18(3), 213–241.