The Spirit of Socially Engaged Buddhism: Public Welfare Operations of Rescue Groups Supported by Buddhist Institutions in the Northern Region of Thailand

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16625948

Keywords:

Buddhist institutions, socially engaged Buddhism, public welfare operation, rescue groups, Northern Region of Thailand

Abstract

Amidst the dangers of people's social lives in a context where Buddhist institutions drive themselves toward becoming socially engaged in Buddhism, this research draws on a purposive sampling of 30 key informants—Buddhist monks and volunteer rescue team members in northern Thailand—who are directly involved in rescue operations. Thematic analysis (TA) was then applied to identify core themes. Employing qualitative research methods, the study aims to gain a deep understanding of rescue groups' public welfare operations, focusing on two important aspects. First, it investigates the operating model of the public welfare operations of the rescue groups supported by Buddhist institutions. And secondly, it analyzes the roles of the public welfare operations of the rescue groups. This article collates sociological perspectives of this effort with Buddhist concepts. The research findings indicate that assisting, supporting, and integrating public welfare operations are at the heart of the operating model of rescue groups that are supported by Buddhist institutions. Assisting refers to direct aid by Buddhist institutions without intermediaries; supporting involves mobilizing resources to enable others to assist; and integrating positions the institution as a social network node, coordinating multi-sectoral participation. Its implications are apparent in three key roles: as initiators in problem-solving, as centers for coordinating cooperation, and as facilitators in strengthening the Buddhist institutions.

References

Best, Joel. 2016. Social Problems. 3rd ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Bodhi, Bhikkhu. 2000. The Connected Discourse of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Saṃyutta Nikāya. Boston: Wisdom Publications.

_____. 2012. The Numerical Discourses of the Buddha. In A Complete Translation of the Aṅguttara Nikāya. Boston: Wisdom Publications.

Boguszewski, R., Makowska, M., Bożewicz, M., and Podkowińska, M. 2020. “The COVID-19 Pandemic’s Impact on Religiosity in Poland.” Religions 11(12): 646. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/rel11120646

Carpiano, Richard M. 2009. “Come take a walk with me: The Go-Along interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being.” Health & Place 15(1): 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.05.3

Christopher S. Queen, ed. 2000. A New Buddhism. In Engaged Buddhism in the West. Boston: Wisdom Publications.

Clarke, Victoria, and Virginia Braun. 2016. “Thematic analysis.” The Journal of Positive Psychology 12(3): 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613

Cockerham, William C. 2015. “Max Weber: Bureaucracy, Formal Rationality and the Modern Hospital.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Social Theory in Health, Illness and Medicine, edited by Fran Collyer, (124–138). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Darlington, Susan M. 2003. “The Spirit(s) of Conservation in Buddhist Thailand.” In Nature across Cultures: Views of Nature and the Environment in Non-Western Cultures, edited by Helaine Selin, 129–146. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0149-5_7.

Dow, Thomas E. 1978. “An Analysis of Weber’s Work on Charisma.” The British Journal of Sociology 29 (1): 83–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/589221.

Feer, Léon, ed. 1884–1898. The Saṃyutta Nikāya. London: Pali Text Society.

Finke, Roger, and Kevin D. 2002. “The Effects of Professional Training: The Social and Religious Capital Acquired in Seminaries.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 41(1): 103–120.

Gemar, Adam. 2023. “Religion and cultural capital in the UK today: identity, cultural engagement and the prevalence of multiple religious identities.” European Societies 25(3): 392– 412. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2022.2132524

Häuberer, Julia. 2011. Social Capital Theory: Towards a Methodological Foundation. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Hillier, Sheila. 1987. Rationalism, bureaucracy, and the organization of the health services: Max Weber’s contribution to understanding modern health care systems. In G. Scambler (Ed.), Sociological theory and medical sociology. London: Tavistock.

Ireland, John D. 1997. The Udāna and the Itivuttaka: Two Classics from the Pali Canon. Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society.

Jearajit, Cholvit. 2022. Phut Nawa Withi: Botrian Rawang Kho Wit Lae Senthang Su Chiwit Withi That Pai (3rd ed.). (In Thai) [Buddhanavavithi: Lessons during Covid and the path to the next way of life]. Ayutthaya: Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University.

Jirattikorn, Amporn. 2016. “Buddhist Holy Man Khruba Bunchum: The Shift in a Millenarian Movement at the Thailand–Myanmar Border.” Sojourn Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 31(2): 377–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1355/sj31-2a

Keyes, Charles F. 1971. “Buddhism and National Integration in Thailand.” Journal of Asian Studies 30(3): 551–567. https://doi.org/10.2307/2052460

King, Sallie B. 2009. Socially Engaged Buddhism. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

Laliberté, André. 2022. Chinese Religions and Welfare Regimes Beyond the PRC. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9828-6_4

Loy, David, and Rothberg, Donald. 2014. Awakening in Service and Action: A Study Retreat on Socially Engaged Buddhism. Buddhist Peace Fellowship. Last modified April 23, 2014. http://buddhistpeace fellowship.org/awakening-in-service-and-action-a-

Mahaarcha, Donlatip, and Somboon Sirisunhirun. 2023. “Social capital and farmers’ participation in multi-level irrigation governance in Thailand.” Heliyon 9(2023): e18793. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.heliyon.2023.

Main, Jessica L., and Rongdao Lai. 2013. “Introduction: Reformulating Socially Engaged Buddhism” as an Analytical Category. The Eastern Buddhist 44(2): 1–34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44362566

Morris, Richard, and Hardy, E, eds. 1885–1900. The Aṅguttara Nikāya. 5 vols. London: Pali Text Society.

Mythen, Gabe. 2004. Living with Risk. In Ulrich Beck: A Critical Introduction to the Risk Society. (117–136). London: Pluto Press.

Oldenberg, H, ed. 1879–1883. Vinayapiṭaka. 5 vols. London: Pali Text Society.

Panyachit, Saichol, and Phoobade, Wanitchanon. 2022. Khru Ba Kuphai: Botbat Sa Tharana Songkhro Ruam Samai Khong Phrakhru Pricha Phi Wat Lae Sun Ku Chip Kuphai Phrao Wang Hin Changwat Chiang Mai. (In Thai) [The Rescue Monk: The Contemporary Public Welfare Role of Phra Khru Preechaphiwat and the Phrao-Wanghin Rescue and Emergency Center, Chiang Mai Province]. Nititham Publishing.

Parsons, Talcott. 1967. Sociological Theory and Modern Society. New York: Free Press.

Phra Paisan Visaro. 2009. The dynamics of religion in the age of globalization. In Community Way: Su ci pu li Book 5, edited by Dhammapitaka et al. Srinakharinwirot University.

Putnam, Robert D. 1994. “Social Capital and Public Affairs.” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 47(8): 5–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/3824796

Davids, Caroline Augusta Foley Rhys, ed. 1975. The Visuddhi-magga of Buddhaghosa. London: Pali Text Society.

Rhy Davids, T. W., and J. Estlin Carpenter, eds. 1890–1911. The Dīgha Nikāya. 3 vols. London: Pali Text Society.

Scupin, Raymond. 1986. “Thailand as a plural society: Ethnic interaction in a Buddhist kingdom.” Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 2(3): 115–140. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40860216

Sirisawad, Natchapol. 2021. Kansueksa Khruea Khai ngan Sa Tharana Songkhro Khong Khana Song Thai Nai Sathanakan Kan Phraerabat Khong Rok Tit Chuea Wairat Kho Ro Na 2019. (In Thai) [The Study of a Public Welfare Network of Thai Sangha in the Coronavirus Disease (Covid-19 Pandemic Situation)]. Journal of MCU Social Science Review 10(3): 264–277. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jssr/article/view/253710

Swartz, David. 1997. Culture and power: the sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Verter, Bradford. 2003. “Spiritual Capital: Theorizing Religion with Bourdieu Against Bourdieu.” Sociological Theory 21(2): 150–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9558.00182

Windisch, Ernst, ed. 1889. Itivuttaka. London: Pali Text Society.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-31

How to Cite

Panyachit, Saichol, and Natchapol Sirisawad. 2025. “The Spirit of Socially Engaged Buddhism: Public Welfare Operations of Rescue Groups Supported by Buddhist Institutions in the Northern Region of Thailand”. Journal of International Buddhist Studies 16 (2):1-16. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16625948.