Supply Chain Management Model Based on the SCOR Framework for Community Enterprises and Organic Vegetable Entrepreneurs in Chiang Mai Province
Keywords:
Supply Chain Management, Community Enterprises, Organic Vegetable GrowersAbstract
This study examines supply chain management (SCM) practices of community enterprises and organic vegetable entrepreneurs in Chiang Mai Province through the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model framework. The research objectives were: (1) to analyze current SCM processes; (2) to identify key problems and obstacles; and (3) to propose strategies for improving supply chain performance. A mixed-methods approach was employed. Quantitative data were collected from 385 respondents using structured questionnaires, and analyzed with descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis. Qualitative data were obtained through in-depth interviews with 15 key informants, including community enterprise leaders, entrepreneurs, and SCM experts, complemented by document reviews, field observations, focus group discussions, and participatory learning forums.
Findings indicated that overall SCM performance was at a good level, especially in sourcing and delivery, where raw material management and transportation were effective. However, weaknesses were observed in planning and production, notably in demand forecasting, market information, access to modern technologies, labor availability, and waste management. These issues reduced supply chain efficiency. The study recommends strategies such as strengthening data-driven planning systems, enhancing flexibility in procurement and production through technology and workforce development, and fostering collaborative networks among local entrepreneurs. These strategies are expected to improve supply chain efficiency and competitiveness, supporting the sustainable growth of organic agriculture in the region.
References
Brzozowski, L. & Mazourek, M. (2018). A sustainable agricultural future relies on the transition to organic agroecological pest management. Sustainability, 10(6), 2023.
Kasztelan, A. (2017). Green growth, green economy and sustainable development: terminological and relational discourse. Prague Economic Papers, 26(4), 487-499.
Khachatryan, A., Sakhbieva, A., Kirpicheva, M., Dolgova, M. & Chernov, S. (2023). Consumer Demand for Environmental Friendliness as a New Round of Modern Marketing Development. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 32(5), 4095-4111.
Kitchaicharoen, J. & Suebpongsang, P. & Singvejsakul, J. & Pradit, O. (2024). Social Return on Investment of Chiang Mai’s Urban Pesticide-free Vegetable Production System Development Project. (pp 344451). Kasetsart University, Thailand.
Mbonyane, B. L., Mbohwa, C. & Pretorius, J. H. C. (2023). Physical and Technological Capital Efficiency for Profit Growth in Small and Medium Enterprises in Gauteng, South Africa: A Descriptive Qualitative Study. Sustainability, 15(8), 6621.
Moyi, E. D. (2003). Networks, information and small enterprises: New technologies and the ambiguity of empowerment. Information Technology for Development, 10(4), 221-232.
Nitzko, S. (2024). Consumer evaluation of food from pesticide-free agriculture in relation to conventional and organic products. Farming System, 2(4), 100112.
Pinta, L. (2022). Supply Chain Management for Safety Agricultural Products of Chiang Mai Social Enterprise Corporation. RMUTL Journal of Business Administration and Liberal Arts, 10(2), 1-18.
Wendt, M. C. & Weinrich, R. (2023). Consumer segmentation for pesticide-free food products in Germany. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 42, 309-321.
Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics, An Introductory Analysis. 2nd Ed. New York: Harper and Row.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Peace Periscope

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.