Application of the concept of Outcome-Based Education in Curriculum Evaluation of PhD Program, Curriculum and Instruction, Mahasarakham University

Abstract

This research was qualitative research. The objectives of this research were to 1) evaluate the Doctor of Philosophy program in Curriculum and Instruction at Mahasarakham University, which applied outcome-based education, and 2) analyzed the strengths and areas for improvement of the program. Data was collected using document analysis and interviews with 24 informants, including the program administrators, instructors, students, graduates, and employers of the graduates. Data analysis was conducted using content analysis and presented according to the principles of outcome-based education. The research findings revealed the following: Principle 1: clarity of focus strength - the expected learning outcomes of the program align with the Thailand Qualification Framework (TQF), area for improvement: the program should consider aligning its expected learning outcomes with the vision and mission of the faculty and university. Principle 2: expand opportunity strength - active learning was integrated into every course, area for improvement: the program should identify lifelong learning skills required for graduates and designate core courses to develop these skills. Principle 3: high expectations strength - the program included supplementary activities such as research workshops and opportunities for publishing research both nationally and internationally, area for improvement: establish criteria and methods for assessing the achievement/non-achievement of Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs). Principle 4: design down strength - the program utilized curriculum mapping to demonstrate the promotion of PLOs across different courses, area for improvement: each course should create and communicate its Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) and the methods for assessing them to the students.