A Synthesis of Researches on Learning Management using Design Thinking in Teacher Education
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research were 1) to study research characteristics from research articles related to learning management using design thinking in teacher education and 2) to synthesize research related to learning management using design thinking in teacher education by analyze content techniques. The sample group was a research article on learning management using design thinking in teacher education that published in the research database ERIC - Education Resources Information Center in the year 2019-2023, 15 topics. The research tool was a summary of research characteristics. Data analysis uses frequency, percentage, and content analysis. The research results are as follows; 1) the results of the study on the characteristics of the research found that the research on learning management through design thinking made in Asia region, the most at 66.67 percent, published in 2022 at 40 percent, and using an experimental research model (Quasi-experimental) the most, accounting for 60 percent. The majority of the sample used were teacher students, accounting for 33.33 percent. For treatment in the research, the learning management activities using design thinking approach were the most used, accounting for 40 percent, and 2) the results of the synthesis of learning management by design thinking, the results showed that most of the research were able to develop the creativity of learners, accounting for 26.67 percent.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
ภุชงค์ โรจน์แสงรัตน์, ปุณณรัตน์ พิชญไพบูลย์ และ ปราวีณยา สุวรรณณัฐโชติ. (2563). การพัฒนารูปแบบการสอนโดยใช้แนวคิดการคิดเชิงออกแบบเป็นฐานเพื่อสร้างสรรค์ผลงานที่ปรากฏอัตลักษณ์ไทยสำหรับนิสิตนักศึกษาระดับปริญญาบัณฑิต วารสารครุศาสตร์ จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย. วารสารครุศาสตร์ จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย, 48(3): 258-273.
ลัดดาวรรณ ณ ระนอง. (2560). การสังเคราะห์งานวิจัยที่ใช้ทฤษฎีการปรึกษาในขอบข่ายงานแนะแนวและ การปรึกษาด้วยเทคนิคการวิเคราะห์เนื้อหา. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University ฉบับภาษาไทย สาขามนุษยศาสตร์ สังคมศาสตร์ และศิลปะ, 10(2): 1488-99.
วิชัย วงษ์ใหญ่ และมารุต พัฒผล. (2563). การออกแบบการเรียนรู้ใน New Normal. กรุงเทพมหานคร: บัณฑิตวิทยาลัย มหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ.
Battelle for Kids. (2019). Framework for 21st Century Learning. http://static.battelleforkids.org/ documents/ p21/P21_Framework_Brief.pdf
Bellanca, J. A. (2010). 21st century skills : Rethinking how students learn.United States: Solution Tree Press
Chon, H. & Sim, J. (2019). “From Design Thinking to Design Knowing: An Educational Perspective.” Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 18(2): 187-200.
Choueiri, L. S., & Mhanna, S. (2013). “The Design Process as a Life Skill.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93: 925-29.
d. school at Stanford University. (n.d.). (2023). “Design Thinking Bootleg.” Retrieved August 18, 2017, from https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/the-bootcamp-bootleg
Goldschmidt, G. & Rogers, P. (2013). “No Title.” Design Studies, 34(4): 454-71.
HPI (Hasso Plattner Institute). (n.d.). (2018). Retrieved May 18, 2020, from https://hpiacademy. de/en/design-thinking/what-is-design-thinking.html
IDEO (Design Thinking for Educators). (2012). Retrieved September 06, 2016, from http://www. designthinkingforeducators.com/toolkit/
Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). “Design Thinking: Past, Present and Possible Futures.” Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2): 121-46.
Leifer L.J. & Steinert M. (2011). “Dancing with Ambiguity: Causality Behavior, Design Thinking, and Triple-Loop-Learning.” Information Knowledge Systems Management, 10(2011): 151-173.
Lor, R. R. (2017). Design Thinking in Education: A Critical Review of Literature. ฺBangkok Thailang: International Academic Conference on Social Sciences and Management.
Noweski, C., Scheer, A., Büttner, N., von Thienen, J., Erdmann, J., & Meinel, C. (2012). Towards a Paradigm Shift in Education Practice: Developing Twenty-First Century Skills with Design Thinking. New York: Springer Heidelberg.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2018). The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030.
Seidel, V. P., & Fixson, S. K. (2013). “Adopting Design Thinking in Novice Multidisciplinary Teams: The Application Andlimits of Design Methods and Reflexive Practices.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(1): 19-33.
