Employees' AI Literacy and Green Innovation Efficiency: The Mediating Role of Dynamic Capabilities and the Moderating Effect of ESG Performance in Chinese Listed Firms
คำสำคัญ:
Green Innovation Efficiency, AI Literacy, Dynamic Capability, Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)บทคัดย่อ
This study aimed to (1) examine the impact of employees’ AI literacy on green innovation efficiency in Chinese listed firms, (2) investigate the mediating role of dynamic capabilities, and (3) analyze the moderating effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance on this relationship. The research employed a quantitative research design using panel data analysis. The sample consisted of 15,700 firm-year observations from Chinese A-share listed companies during the period 2015–2021, selected through purposive sampling based on data availability and completeness. The research instruments were constructed from secondary data sources, including corporate annual reports, ESG rating databases, and financial and patent databases. Employees’ AI literacy was measured using text mining and word frequency analysis, while green innovation efficiency, dynamic capabilities, and ESG performance were operationalized using established indices.
Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, fixed-effects regression, mediation analysis, moderation analysis, and moderated mediation analysis. The results indicated that employees’ AI literacy had a significant positive effect on green innovation efficiency. Dynamic capabilities were found to play a mediating role in this relationship, demonstrating that AI literacy enhances firms’ ability to integrate, adapt, and reconfigure resources, thereby improving innovation outcomes. Furthermore, ESG performance significantly moderated both the direct and indirect relationships, strengthening the positive impact of AI literacy on green innovation efficiency through dynamic capabilities. Additional heterogeneity analysis revealed that the effects were more pronounced in high-tech firms and varied across regions, with the strongest impact observed in central China. The findings contribute to theoretical and practical knowledge by highlighting employees’ AI literacy as a critical micro-level driver of green innovation efficiency and by integrating dynamic capability theory with ESG frameworks. The study suggests that firms should invest in enhancing employees’ AI competencies, strengthen organizational dynamic capabilities, and foster ESG-oriented governance environments to maximize green innovation performance. These insights provide valuable guidance for policymakers and corporate managers in promoting sustainable development through the synergistic integration of human capital, organizational capabilities, and sustainability strategies.
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Ambrosini, V. & Bowman, C. (2009). What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management?. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 29–49.
Bilal, A., Li, X., Zhu, N., Sharma, R. & Jahanger, A. (2021). Green technology innovation, globalization, and CO2 emissions: Recent insights from the OBOR economies. Sustainability, 14(1), 236-252.
Billi, A. & Bernardo, A. (2025). The effects of digital transformation, IT innovation, and sustainability strategies on firms' performances: An empirical study. Sustainability, 17(3), 823-841.
Correia, R. J., Dias, J. G. & Teixeira, M. S. (2021). Dynamic capabilities and competitive advantages as mediator variables between market orientation and business performance. Journal of Strategy and Management, 14(2), 187–206.
Ferreira, J., Cardim, S. & Coelho, A. (2021). Dynamic capabilities and mediating effects of innovation on the competitive advantage and firm's performance: The moderating role of organizational learning capability. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(2), 620–644.
Han, S., Li, C., Li, M., Lenzen, M., Chen, X., Zhang, Y., Li, M., Yin, T., Li, Y. & Li, J. (2024). Prospects for global sustainable development through integrating the environmental impacts of economic activities. Nature Communications, 15(1), 8424-8439.
Hussain, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence and entrepreneurial success: Exploring innovation capability and digital literacy as dynamic enablers of performance. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 3(14), 1257-1271.
Islam, H. (2025). Nexus of economic, social, and environmental factors on sustainable development goals: The moderating role of technological advancement and green innovation. Innovation and Green Development, 4(1), 100183-100194.
Li, C., Hassan, H., Murad, M. & Mirza, F. (2023). Role of green dynamic capabilities on environmental and social innovation behavior: Mediating of green creativity and moderating of innovation proclivity. Sustainability, 15(20), 14996-15014.
Liedong, T. A., Taticchi, P., Rajwani, T. & Pisani, N. (2022). Gracious growth: How to manage the trade-off between corporate greening and corporate growth. Organizational Dynamics, 51(3), 100895-100995.
Rachmatulloh, B., Herdiana, B. N. D. & Retnasih, N. R. (2025). The influence of digital trust and artificial intelligence literacy on business sustainability: The mediating role of innovation capability. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 25(10), 484–501.
Rajesh, R. & Rajendran, C. (2020). Relating environmental, social, and governance scores and sustainability performances of firms: An empirical analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1247–1267.
Stern, N., & Xie, C. (2023). China's new growth story: Linking the 14th five-year plan with the 2060 carbon neutrality pledge. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 21(1), 5–25.
Tang, L., Jiang, H., Hou, S., Zheng, J. & Miao, L. (2023). The effect of enterprise digital transformation on green technology innovation: A quantitative study on Chinese listed companies. Sustainability, 15(13), 10036-10053.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
Thapa, P., Mainali, B. & Dhakal, S. (2023). Focus on climate action: What level of synergy and trade-off is there between SDG 13; climate action and other SDGs in Nepal? Energies, 16(1), 566-597.
Tu, C., Liang, Y. & Fu, Y. (2024). How does the environmental attention of local governments affect regional green development? Empirical evidence from local governments in China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–14.
Tyan, J., Liu, S. & Fu, J. (2024). How environmental, social, and governance implementation and structure impact sustainable development goals. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(4), 3235–3250.
Wang, Q., Sun, T. & Li, R. (2025). Does artificial intelligence promote green innovation? An assessment based on direct, indirect, spillover, and heterogeneity effects. Energy & Environment, 36(2), 1005–1037.
Xu, H. & Tian, Y. (2025). Government-initiated environmental credit rating and corporate climate transition risk exposure. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 1(1), 1-22.
Yan, X., Zhang, Y. & Pei, L.-L. (2021). The impact of risk-taking level on green technology innovation: Evidence from energy-intensive listed companies in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 124685-124695.
Yin, S., Yu, Y. & Zhang, N. (2024). The effect of digital green strategic orientation on digital green innovation performance: From the perspective of digital green business model innovation. Sage OPEN, 14(2), 1-22.
Yousaf, Z. (2021). Go for green: Green innovation through green dynamic capabilities: Accessing the mediating role of green practices and green value co-creation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(39), 54863–54875.
Zhao, Y., Shang, J., Yang, X. & Shi, G. (2025). The road o sustainable development: Exploring the impact of green technology innovation and environmental regulation on the green competitiveness of heavily polluting manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 68(13), 3144–3171.
ดาวน์โหลด
เผยแพร่แล้ว
รูปแบบการอ้างอิง
ฉบับ
ประเภทบทความ
สัญญาอนุญาต
ลิขสิทธิ์ (c) 2026 วารสารสันติสุขปริทรรศน์

อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.