Involvement Load Hypothesis: Vocabulary Knowledge Acquisition Through Reading with Target Words
คำสำคัญ:
Involvement Load Hypothesis, Vocabulary Acquisition, Vocabulary Knowledgeบทคัดย่อ
This study aimed to (1) examine learners’ acquisition of target vocabulary through reading tasks based on the Involvement Load Hypothesis (ILH) and (2) analyze the effects of task-induced involvement on the development of learners’ vocabulary knowledge. The research employed a quasi-experimental design. The sample consisted of 18 first-year Business English students selected through simple random sampling. The research instruments included (1) the Vocabulary Knowledge Scale (VKS) to assess vocabulary knowledge and (2) ILH-based reading tasks designed to incorporate the three components of involvement: need, search, and evaluation. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, and paired-sample t-test.
The findings revealed that (1) learners demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in receptive vocabulary knowledge at the .05 level, particularly in their ability to recognize and explain the meanings of target words after the intervention, and (2) task-induced involvement, as conceptualized by ILH, had a positive effect on vocabulary acquisition, especially in terms of retention and comprehension. However, learners’ productive vocabulary knowledge, particularly their ability to use target words in context, remained limited and showed no significant improvement. These results suggest that ILH-based reading tasks are effective in enhancing receptive vocabulary learning but are insufficient on their own to develop productive vocabulary skills. The study highlights the importance of integrating output-oriented activities to complement ILH-based tasks. The findings contribute to pedagogical knowledge by providing a practical framework for designing vocabulary instruction that promotes deeper cognitive engagement and supports effective vocabulary learning in EFL contexts.
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Ansarin, A. A. & Bayazidi, A. (2016). Task type and incidental L2 vocabulary learning: Repetition versus task involvement load. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 34(2), 135–146.
Bao, G. (2015). Task type effects on English as a foreign language learners’ acquisition of receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge. System, 53, 84–95.
Barcroft, J. (2006). Can writing a new word detract from learning? More negative effects of forced output during vocabulary learning. Second Language Research, 22(4), 487–497.
Brown, D. (2011). Using a modified version of the vocabulary knowledge scale to aid vocabulary development. The Language Teacher, 40, 125–137.
Bruton, A. (2009). The vocabulary knowledge scale: A critical analysis. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(4), 288–297.
Hazrat, M. & Read, J. (2022). Enhancing the involvement load hypothesis as a tool for classroom vocabulary research. TESOL Quarterly, 56(1), 387–400.
Hulstijn, J. H. & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51(3), 539–558.
Jeffries, L. & Mikulecky, B. S. (2012). More reading power 3. Pearson Education ESL.
Jing, L. & Jianbin, H. (2009). An empirical study of the involvement load hypothesis in incidental vocabulary acquisition in EFL listening. Polyglossia, 16, 1–11.
Laufer, B. & Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1–26.
Qian, D. D. (1996). ESL vocabulary acquisition: Contextualization and decontextualization. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(1).
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge University Press.
Rott, S. (1999). The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners’ incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 589–619.
Teng, M. F. & Zhang, D. (2021). Task-induced involvement load, vocabulary learning in a foreign language, and their association with metacognition. Language Teaching Research, 28(2), 531–555.
Wesche, M. & Paribakht, T. S. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breadth. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(1), 13–40.
Willis, M. & Ohashi, Y. (2012). A model of L2 vocabulary learning and retention. The Language Learning Journal, 40(1), 125–137.
Yaqubi, B., Rayati, R. A. & Gorgi, A. (2010). The involvement load hypothesis and vocabulary learning: The effect of task types and involvement index on L2 vocabulary acquisition. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 2(2), 145–163.
ดาวน์โหลด
เผยแพร่แล้ว
รูปแบบการอ้างอิง
ฉบับ
ประเภทบทความ
สัญญาอนุญาต
ลิขสิทธิ์ (c) 2026 วารสารสันติสุขปริทรรศน์

อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.